Start on Starter to see the leaks. Move to Growth when you want the agents working. Move to Scale when you would rather approve a budget than approve every action.
For founders validating a growth motion.
For teams that want the whole picture and the fixes.
For operators who want execution, not dashboards.
| Feature | Starter | Growth | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Websites analyzed | 1 | 3 | Unlimited |
| Integrations | 2 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Priced opportunities | Top 3 | All | All |
| AI agents | 1 (Conversion) | 5 | 5 + custom |
| Experiments | 1 active | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Lead generation | — | 500 accounts/mo | 2,500 accounts/mo |
| Outbound campaigns | — | 3 active | Unlimited |
| Autonomous execution | — | With approval | Within budget limits |
| Workspaces | 1 | 1 | Multiple |
| Seats | 1 | 5 | Unlimited |
| Support | Shared Slack | Dedicated growth engineer |
It reads your website, funnel data, CRM, ads and billing in one pass, then compares every step against benchmarks from similar companies. Anything that underperforms its own benchmark becomes an opportunity with a dollar value attached.
No. Every agent action lands in Approvals first. You choose the autonomy level per agent - suggest only, approve each action, or autonomous within budget limits you set.
The initial analysis takes about 90 seconds on the website alone. Connecting Stripe and Analytics adds depth within the first hour.
Routn starts with whatever you have, even just a website. Each integration you add makes the estimates tighter and unlocks the agents that need that data.
Each opportunity models the gap between your current metric and a realistic target, multiplied by the traffic or account volume already flowing through that step. The model shows its inputs so you can argue with it.
Yes. Variants push to Webflow, WordPress or a script tag, and results are read back from your analytics with confidence intervals.
Run the analysis first. The opportunities it finds usually make the plan choice obvious.
Analyze your business